Personalised learning: not an optional preference

I heard a story recently about an English teacher using the class’s interest in sport to motivate and engage them in their lessons. The parent relaying this was so impressed by the ‘personalisation’ of learning. Many parents think that differentiating instruction for the class is the same as personalising learning for the child. In fact, very few schools I know of are personalising learning only because the current model prevents them from doing it. We will turn this on its head when we start from the child, not the class.

Personalised learning allows the learner to contribute to their own learning: the design of it, the responsibility for it and the identification of learning goals. Every child at school is entitled to know what they are going to learn, how they are going to learn it, how they will know they have learned it and the teacher knows where the child is at before they start the teaching. All good teachers know and understand this but our current structure dictates the learning.

I understand teachers feel immense pressure to deliver in an age of increased accountability and transparency. It seems also that school systems whose role it is to support schools and leaders are drowning under the weight of compliance. Additionally, governments look to other nations in making the next bold educational policy statement.

I have no doubt teachers are working hard but I believe they are working hard at the wrong things. This is not about replicating a new version of the old system. If we are seriously committed to personalising learning for every child, we need to disentangle ourselves from the current model. This includes the definition of teacher’s work, which forms the basis of industrial agreements. No industrial agreement can cover the complexity of teaching in today’s world nor the flexibility required to deliver challenging and relevant learning. Each of us has to be open to asking the hard questions.

To quote Sheninger and Murray in Learning Transformed (p 55),

Making student learning personal and authentic is no longer an option; it’s a necessity. It’s the exact type of learning that students experience outside of school when consuming and creating content. If we want to reengage students and reignite their passion for learning, we have no choice but to give them various opportunities to choose what they are learning, how they will learn, and ultimately, how they can show mastery of their learning. 

 

 


3 thoughts on “Personalised learning: not an optional preference

  1. Steiner education is perhaps an area you should be researching if you want this type of model in your schools.

  2. Such a powerful statement and something both John and I believe in strongly. I am going to share your wise words with our twin’s High School (not in our system) who at this point in time, teach to the middle and use an assessment model which provides information so they can report on progress!! Thank you for always reminding us about what education should look like in the 21st century.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.