Advice to our new PM

Two weeks ago, Professorial fellow and former Dean of Education, University of Melbourne Professor Brian J. Caldwell delivered our  annual Ann D Clark lecture.  It was timely for two reasons – Professor Caldwell and Jim Spinks’ book ‘The Self-Transforming School‘ is recently published and the book contains advice to our incoming federal government – stay out of education.

While the incoming coalition government has committed to supporting the autonomy of school systems and playing a limited role in school education, we are yet to see what this looks like in reality.  In a piece last month on the role Canberra should play in our schools, the Grattan Institute’s Ben Jensen wrote, “because the commonwealth spends about one-third of all public funds in school education, it will always want something for its investment”.

There is consensus across school sectors, academia and tiers of government that in terms of student achievement on international tests, we haven’t made any significant improvement.  What is more worrying though is the ever widening gap between low and high performing students.

One of the reasons why Caldwell and Spinks are suggesting that the federal government stay out of education is that the ‘control and command strategies’ used in the past haven’t resulted in the desired outcome – ie. sustainable and long term school improvement. Caldwell writes, “tying everything to implementation of a ‘national plan for better schools’ was bizarre, given that school improvement is something that schools must be responsible and accountable for.”

Caldwell argues that there is a strong case for change in Australia.  He proposes that we follow Canada’s lead (which outperforms Australia on international tests of student achievement) where there is no federal government ‘apparatus’ in education.  A Council of Ministers that would determine national policies and priorities would replace a Minister of Education. Wherever possible funding would be directly funneled to schools or at the very least to state and territory governments as well as independent and Catholic school sectors. This model is built on the premise that you locate expertise and resources as close as possible to the learning space. It takes into account the equity and diversity of school needs as well as being open, transparent and accountable to public scrutiny.

Caldwell says that self-transforming schools don’t need two levels of governments competing against one another in order to tell schools what to do.  In Canada there is competition among provinces and almost all innovation comes from individual schools and systems. Leadership is critical in this model because school leaders are empowered to respond to change.  Who better to address the diverse learning needs of a school community than the school itself?  I agree but the challenge is how to go about about increasing school autonomy while ensuring we get the learning and teaching strategies right for every child.  This requires effective instructional leaders leading in every school.  That’s perhaps the biggest challenge of all.

My view is that those who can and must improve schools are schools themselves (supported by forward-thinking systems and governments). However, there will always be a place for intelligent debate and intelligent educational policy that acknowledges the demands of a contemporary and connected world.

Let’s hope that in the next few years, Australia will become a truly ‘learning nation’.

Comments on: "Advice to our new PM" (3)

  1. Good piece Greg. The Stalinist model of centralism so beloved of the previous administration was doomed to failure. Devolving decision-making to the lowest viable level of administration (the individual school) is an example of the type of common sense that is no longer common. You offer an important qualification though when you say, “This requires effective instructional leaders leading in every school. ” Devolution with no focus upon up-skilling, motivating and inspiring those who will be responsible for outcomes is also a doomed model. The liberal democratic project sees individuals as best able to decide for themselves what work best in their particular locale. It starts from the ontological premise that human persons are capable of making good decisions when they have the motivation, resources and training to do so. It also allows for things such as creativity, flair and innovation to flourish. Exciting times with much work ahead.

  2. Attila Lendvai said:

    Very pertinent Greg. I think that the key to this is as you say – INTELLIGENT debate. Unfortunately not all the debate and discussion we hear is intelligent. Just because everyone has had an experience of schooling doesn’t mean that everyone is truly informed or qualified to lead debate or set policy. Teachers, principals and system leaders are obviously best poised to make decisions which improve student outcomes. However, talk back radio and tabloid media tend to hold that education is best governed by popular opinion. Schools, as you say, are best placed to lead the debate on education improvement because we’re at the local level and able to identify the key issues. Of course data must validate the issues and qualitative research must then be applied. A system approach, as we have in Parramatta, also strengthens the development and progress. But improvement comes with a cost. All school systems need money and it’s understandable that the provider of those funds will want a return. More money for health must give us more beds, shorter waiting times and especially more doctors and nurses. More money for law and order should give us safer communities and more police. Is it too simplistic to think that more education money will just deliver more able learners and fewer illiterate kids? Can or will our new federal government provide more funds and allow systems to drive their own improvements without strings remains to be seen. Gonski validated the need for more money directly to schools to make up for deficiencies but didn’t advocate the need for conditions. Has any child become a better reader because of NAPLAN, government accountabilities or the MySchool site?

  3. Greg I whole heartedly agree with your comments.Having recently attended BLC 13 We need our incoming Government to listen to and view China through the eyes of Dr Yong Zhao. Educational transformation can be viewed in the data obtained vis PISA on China who almost a decade ago realised that if Government intervened less Learning improved.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,400 other followers